Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Conflict Management and Peace Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Reassessment of Democratic Pacifism at the Monadic Level of Analysis

Charles R. Boehmer

University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas, USA, crboehmer{at}utep.edu

Are democracies generally peaceful? Studies have produced mixed evidence, both for and against this proposition. I review and update the literature on this topic and explore reasons why some scholars have come to emphasize those studies showing that democracies are no more or less conflict-prone than other states. This paper re-examines democracy and conflict at the state level of analysis from 1884 to 1999 using a broad sample of states and appropriate statistical estimators. The results show that democracies are less likely to initiate militarized conflicts. I also find that political competition has a stronger pacifying effect than executive constraints when disaggregating the Polity IV democracy index.

Key Words: democracy • militarized disputes • military conflict • war • pacifism

References

  • Babst, D. 1972. A force for peace. Industrial Research 14 (April): 55-58.
  • Beck, N., J. Katz, and R. Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260-1288.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bennett, D.S., and A. Stam. 2000a. Research design and estimator choices in the analysis of interstate dyads: When decisions matter. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (5): 653-685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bennett, D.S., and A. Stam. 2000b. EUGene 1.95. Software available at http://eugenesoftware.org.
  • Bennett, D.S., and A.C. Stam. 2004. The behavioral origins of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Benoit, K. 1996. Democracies really are more pacific (in general). Journal of Conflict Resolution 40(4): 636-657.[Abstract]
  • Bollen, K.A. 1993. Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science 37:1207-1230.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bremer, S. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1995. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2): 309-341.[Abstract]
  • Caprioli, M., and P.F. Trumbore. 2006. First use of violent force in militarized interstate disputes, 1980-2001. Journal of Peace Research 43(6): 741-749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Chan, S. 1984. Mirror, mirror, on the wall...: Are the freer countries more pacific? Journal of Conflict Resolution 28(4): 617-648.[Abstract]
  • Chan, S. 1997. In search of democratic peace: Problems and promise. Mershon International Studies Review 41(2): 59-91.[CrossRef]
  • Croco, S.E., and T.K. Teo. 2005. Assessing the dyadic approach to interstate conflict processes: A.k.a. "dangerous" dyad-years. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(1): 5-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Domke, W. 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Doyle, M. 1983. Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(3): 205-235.
  • East, M., and P.M. Greg. 1967. Factors influencing cooperation and conflict in the international system. International Studies Quarterly 11 (September): 244-269.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • East, M., and C.F. Hermann. 1974. Do nation-types account for foreign policy behavior? In Rosenau, J. N. ed., Comparing foreign policies, New York: Wiley, 209-303.
  • Ghosn, F., G. Palmer, and S.A. Bremer. 2004. The MID3 data set, 1993-2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 133-154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gleditsch, K.S., and M.D. Ward. 1997. Double take: A re-examination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(3): 361-383.[Abstract]
  • Gleditsch, N.P., and H. Hegre. 1997. Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(2): 283-310.[Abstract]
  • Goertz, G. 2006. Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Goldstein, J.S. 2005. International relations, 6th edition. New York: Longman.
  • Haas, Michael. 1965. Societal approaches to the study of war. Journal of Peace Research 2(4): 307- 323.[Free Full Text]
  • Hewitt, J., and J. Wilkenfeld. 1996. Democracy and international crisis. International Interactions 22(2): 123-142.[Web of Science]
  • Huth, P.K., and T.L. Allee. 2002. The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ireland, M.J., and S.S. Gartner. 2001. Time to fight: Government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(5): 547-568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jones, D., S. Bremer, and J.D. Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(2): 163- 213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lai, B., and D. Slater. 2006. Institutions of the offensive: Domestic sources of dispute initiation in authoritarian regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 113- 126.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Leblang, D., and S. Chan. 2003. Explaining wars fought by established democracies: Do institutional constraints matter? Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 385-400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Leeds, B.A., and D. Davis. 1999. Beneath the surface: Regime type and international interaction, 1953-78. Journal of Peace Research 36(1): 5-21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Long, S.J., and J. Freese. 2001. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  • Maoz, Z., and N. Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33(1): 3-35.[Abstract]
  • Maoz, Z., and B. Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87(3): 624-638.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Marshall, M.G., and K. Jaggers. 2000. Polity IV Project. Available at http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity.
  • Most, B., and H. Starr. 1989. Inquiry, logic, and international politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Mousseau, M., H. Hegre, and J.R. Oneal. 2003. How the wealth of nations conditions the liberal peace. European Journal of International Relations 9(2): 277-314.[Abstract]
  • Palmer, G., T.R. London, and P.M. Regen. 2004. What's stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies. International Interactions 30(1): 1-24.[Web of Science]
  • Ray, J.L. 1995. Democracy and international conflict: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Rioux, J.-S. 1998. A crisis-based evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Canadian Journal of Political Science 31(2): 263-283.
  • Rosecrance, R. 1986. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
  • Rousseau, D.L. 2005. Democracy and war: Institutions, norms, and the evolution of international conflict. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Rousseau, D., C. Gelpi, D. Reiter, and P. Huth. 1996. Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918-88. American Political Science Review 90(3): 512-533.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rummel, R.J. 1979. Understanding conflict and war: Volume 4: War, power, peace. New York: Sage.
  • Rummel, R.J. 1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(1): 3-26.
  • Rummel, R.J. 1997. Power kills: Democracy as a method of non-violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Russett, B.M., and H. Starr. 2000. From democratic peace to Kantian peace: Democracy and conflict in the international system, In Midlarsky, M. I., ed., Handbook of war studies II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Russett, B., and J. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
  • Salmore, S.A., and C.F. Hermann, 1969. The effect of size, development and accountability on foreign policy. Peace Science Society Papers 14:16-30.
  • Schultz, K.A. 2001. Democracy and coercive diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Souva, M., and B. Prins. 2006. The liberal peace revisited: The role of democracy, dependence, and development in militarized interstate dispute initiation, 1950-1999. International Interactions 32(2): 183-200.
  • Singer, J.D. 1987. Reconstructing the Correlates of War dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816-1985. International Interactions 14: 115-132.
  • Singer, J.D., S. Bremer, and J. Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965, In Russett, B., ed., Peace, war, and numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 19-48.
  • Siverson, R., and H. Starr. 1991. The diffusion of war: A study of opportunity and willingness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Small, M., and D.J. Singer. 1976. The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816-1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1 (Summer): 50-69.
  • Vanhanen, T. 1990. The process of democratization: A comparative study of 147 states, 1980-1988. New York: Crane Russak.
  • Weede, E. 1984. Democracy and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28(4): 649-664.[Abstract]
  • Wright, Q. 1942. A study of war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Zinnes, D. 1980. Why war? Evidence of the outbreak of international conflict. In Gurr, T.R., ed., Handbook of political conflict. New York: Free Press, pp. 331-360.
  • Zinnes, D., and J. Wilkenfeld. 1971. An analysis of foreign conflict behavior of nations. In Hanreider, W. F., ed., Comparative foreign policy. New York: McKay, pp. 200-216.

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 81-94 (2008)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940701860482
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of International RelationsHome page
B. M. Russett
Democracy, War and Expansion through Historical Lenses
European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 9 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?