This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carment, D. Articles by Prest, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation: An Empirical Analysis

Country Indicators for Foreign Policy Project on Fragile States The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, david_carment{at}carleton.ca

Yiagadeesen Samy

Country Indicators for Foreign Policy Project on Fragile States The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Stewart Prest

Country Indicators for Foreign Policy Project on Fragile States The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

In recent years, state fragility has gained importance as a result of the perceived links between poverty, conflict, and global terrorism. In this paper, we examine the relationship between state fragility and aid by evaluating the literature and research programs currently extant. We bring conceptual clarity to the issue by developing and testing an alternative theoretical framework using CIFP's fragility index (articulated around the concepts of authority, legitimacy, and capacity [ALC]) and by using data collected for the period 1999—2005 to identify the empirical determinants of fragility. We then examine the effects of state fragility on aid allocation, using the ALC framework as defined. Our results indicate that aid allocation is directed toward states on the basis of their capacity and authority scores and not on the basis of their legitimacy scores. Finally, we assess the theoretical and policy implications of these findings and specify directions for future research.

Key Words: fragile states • foreign aid • failed states • risk assessment • Country Indicators for Foreign Policy

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 25, No. 4, 349-373 (2008)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940802397509


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?