Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Conflict Management and Peace Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arena, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Success Breeds Success? War Outcomes, Domestic Opposition, and Elections

Philip Arena

Pennsylvania State University State College Pennsylvania, USA, pua103{at}psu.edu

War outcomes are unlikely to effect elections if the major parties did not disagree over the war. Leaders who enter into wars are more likely to be punished for defeat or rewarded for victory if the opposition did not support the government during the war. Employing original data on legislative opposition during interstate wars, this paper examines all elections since WWII in the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, and India. The results confirm that leaders are far more likely to be punished (rewarded) for bad (good) outcomes if the opposition did not support the war. Further, there is no direct effect of either war outcomes or the position of the opposition. It is only when considered in conjunction with the opposition's behavior that the important link between war outcomes and elections is revealed.

Key Words: accountability • costs • elections • war • opposition

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, 136-151 (2008)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940802007249


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. S. Gartner
Reopening the Black Box of War: War and Domestic Politics1
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 95 - 97.
[PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. S. Gartner
Secondary Casualty Information: Casualty Uncertainty, Female Casualties, and Wartime Support
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 98 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
P. L. Sullivan
Sustaining the Fight: A Cross-Sectional Time-Series Analysis of Public Support for Ongoing Military Interventions
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 112 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
K. M. Kadera and D. S. Morey
The Trade-Offs of Fighting and Investing: A Model of the Evolution of War and Peace1
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 152 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
Z. Maoz and R. M. Siverson
Bargaining, Domestic Politics, and International Context in the Management of War: A Review Essay
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 171 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]