This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Quackenbush, S. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Identifying Opportunity for Conflict: Politically Active Dyads

Department of Political Science University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri, USA, quackenbushs{at}missouri.edu

Since states cannot fight without the opportunity to do so, empirical identification of opportunity is important. Unfortunately, previous measures of opportunity—politically relevant dyads, the politically relevant international environment, and regional dyads—are inadequate. I attempt to measure opportunity by developing the concept of a politically active dyad, using contiguity, power status, and alliances as defining characteristics. I then use Braumoeller and Goertz's (2000) methodology for necessary conditions to compare active dyads with previous measures. This test demonstrates that although previous measures are unable to capture opportunity as a necessary condition for international conflict, the concept of politically active dyads does.

Key Words: opportunity • case selection • political relevance • necessary conditions

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 23, No. 1, 37-51 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940500503804


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Beardsley and V. Asal Nuclear Weapons as Shields Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 235 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Quackenbush and M. Rudy Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 268 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF]