This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Achen, C. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Let's Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong

Department of Politics Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey, USA, achen{at}princeton.edu

Many social scientists believe that dumping long lists of explanatory variables into linear regression, probit, logit, and other statistical equations will successfully "control" for the effects of auxiliary factors. Encouraged by convenient software and ever more powerful computing, researchers also believe that this conventional approach gives the true explanatory variables the best chance to emerge. The present paper argues that these beliefs are false, and that without intensive data analysis, linear regression models are likely to be inaccurate. Instead, a quite different and less mechanical research methodology is needed, one that integrates contemporary powerful statistical methods with deep substantive knowledge and classic data—analytic techniques of creative engagement with the data.

Key Words: regression analysis • linearity • data analysis • rule of three • monotonicity

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 327-339 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940500339167


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Hug The Effect of Misclassifications in Probit Models: Monte Carlo Simulations and Applications Political Analysis, January 1, 2010; 18(1): 78 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fuhrmann Taking a Walk on the Supply Side: The Determinants of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 181 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre Trade Dependence or Size Dependence?: The Gravity Model of Trade and the Liberal Peace Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 26 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Clarke Return of the Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Political Research Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 46 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Lebovic and E. Voeten The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 79 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Levy Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Levy Qualitative Methods and Cross-Method Dialogue in Political Science Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 196 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Goertz Introduction to the Special Issue "Causal Complexity and Qualitative Methods" Political Analysis, July 1, 2006; 14(3): 223 - 226. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Mahoney and G. Goertz A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research Political Analysis, July 1, 2006; 14(3): 227 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]