Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Conflict Management and Peace Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadera, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin Mitchell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Heeding Ray's Advice: An Exegesis on Control Variables in Systemic Democratic Peace Research

Kelly M. Kadera

Department of Political Science University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa, USA, kelly-kadera{at}uiowa.edu

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell

Department of Political Science University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa, USA

We submit our recent systemic democratic peace research to the control variable doctrine of James Lee Ray, as codified in his 2003 treatise. In particular, we seek to determine whether international institutions intervene in the relationship between the democratic community's strength and the use and effectiveness of third party conflict management, whether hegemony is a competing explanation of third party settlement, and whether our extant model is robust when several control variables are specified. Two important conclusions are reached: (1) the democratic community's strength and institutional vitality promote third party mediation and its success, regardless of hegemonic might and other controls; and 2) Ray's teaching is properly understood as an exhortation for scholars to more carefully consider the theoretical role of each control variable and its proper treatment in statistical models, not as an edict banning the use of control variables.

Key Words: democratic peace • control variables • systemic analysis • third parties • conflict management • hegemony

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 311-326 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940500339191
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. E. Hansen, S. McLaughlin Mitchell, and S. C. Nemeth
IO Mediation of Interstate Conflicts: Moving Beyond the Global versus Regional Dichotomy
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 295 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]