|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description
Faten Ghosn
Political Science Department The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA, fghosn{at}psu.edu
Glenn Palmer
Political Science Department The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Stuart A. Bremer
Political Science Department The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Dealing with questions of war and peace and understanding the causes of interstate conflict is a primary goal of the field of international relations. In order to study interstate conflict in a rigorous manner, scholars have relied on established rules and procedures for gathering information into coherent data sets. Among those data sets is the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) data. In this paper we first outline the data-collection process for the MID3 data. Second, we introduce two new data sets emerging from the project, "MID-I" and "MID-IP." Third, we present relatively small changes in coding rules for the new MID3 data and some descriptive statistics. The statistics indicate that the MID3 data are remarkably similar to the MID2.1 version, varying in some minor and predictable ways.
Key Words: MID • militarized interstate dispute • conflict • data set
Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 21, No. 2,
133-154 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/07388940490463861
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
K. Barbieri, O. M.G. Keshk, and B. M. Pollins
Trading Data: Evaluating our Assumptions and Coding Rules
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
November 1, 2009;
26(5):
471 - 491.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Lake
Relational Authority and Legitimacy in International Relations
American Behavioral Scientist,
November 1, 2009;
53(3):
331 - 353.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Stanley and J. P. Sawyer
The Equifinality of War Termination: Multiple Paths to Ending War
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
October 1, 2009;
53(5):
651 - 676.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Quackenbush and M. Rudy
Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2009;
26(3):
268 - 285.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Hensel, M. E. Allison, and A. Khanani
Territorial Integrity Treaties and Armed Conflict over Territory
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
April 1, 2009;
26(2):
120 - 143.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Fuhrmann
Taking a Walk on the Supply Side: The Determinants of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
April 1, 2009;
53(2):
181 - 208.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Gartzke and D.-J. Jo
Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
April 1, 2009;
53(2):
209 - 233.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Enterline and J. M. Greig
Perfect Storms?: Political Instability in Imposed Polities and the Futures of Iraq and Afghanistan
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
December 1, 2008;
52(6):
880 - 915.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Quackenbush and J. F. Venteicher
Settlements, Outcomes, and the Recurrence of Conflict
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 2008;
45(6):
723 - 742.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tir and M. Jasinski
Domestic-Level Diversionary Theory of War: Targeting Ethnic Minorities
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
October 1, 2008;
52(5):
641 - 664.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J.C. Crescenzi, A. J. Enterline, and S. B. Long
Bringing Cooperation Back In: A Dynamic Model of Interstate Interaction
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2008;
25(3):
264 - 280.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Hegre
Polarization and Interstate Conflict
Journal of Peace Research,
March 1, 2008;
45(2):
261 - 282.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Boehmer
A Reassessment of Democratic Pacifism at the Monadic Level of Analysis
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
February 1, 2008;
25(1):
81 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Hensel, S. McLaughlin Mitchell, T. E. Sowers II, and C. L. Thyne
Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
February 1, 2008;
52(1):
117 - 143.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lektzian and M. Souva
An Institutional Theory of Sanctions Onset and Success
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
December 1, 2007;
51(6):
848 - 871.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Ashley Leeds and M. Mattes
Alliance Politics during the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History?
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2007;
24(3):
183 - 199.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tir
Domestic-Level Territorial Disputes: Conflict Management via Secession
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
September 1, 2006;
23(4):
309 - 328.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. F. Diehl
Just a Phase?: Integrating Conflict Dynamics Over Time
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2006;
23(3):
199 - 210.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Bennett
Exploring Operationalizations of Political Relevance
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2006;
23(3):
245 - 261.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Foster
State Power, Linkage Mechanisms, and Diversion against Nonrivals
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
February 1, 2006;
23(1):
1 - 21.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Quackenbush
Identifying Opportunity for Conflict: Politically Active Dyads
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
February 1, 2006;
23(1):
37 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chan
Discerning the Causal Relationships Between Great Powers' Membership in Intergovernmental Organizations and Their Initiation of Militarized Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
July 1, 2005;
22(3):
239 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction from the Editor
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
February 1, 2005;
22(1):
1 - 3.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Corbetta and W. J. Dixon
Danger Beyond Dyads: Third-Party Participants in Militarized Interstate Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
February 1, 2005;
22(1):
39 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
