Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Conflict Management and Peace Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geller, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Power Transition and Conflict Initiation

Daniel S. Geller

University of Mississippi, Political Science

Most theories of war and lesser forms of international conflict rest on assumptions of rational choice. Moreover, many of these explanations explicitly incorporate decision maker estimates of relative power among competitors. However, a major theory of great power war-power transition theory-postulates initiation by the weaker contender. This study demonstrates that among the strongest states an interactive relationship exists between the static power balance, differential growth rates in capabilities, and conflict initiation: initiation patterns are associated with changes in a state's relative military/economic power and power potential. The findings are consistent with the inherent logic of power transition theory and are consonant with an assumption of rational calculation in decisions involving conflict initiation. The results may be interpreted as reinforcing the realist contention that a shifting power balance is of critical significance among the causes of war and peace.

Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-16 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/073889429201200101
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. Suzuki, V. Krause, and J. D. Singer
The Correlates of War Project: a Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964-2000
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2002; 19(2): 69 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
H. Ben-Yehuda
Opportunity Crises: Framework and Findings, 1918-1994
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1999; 17(1): 69 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. G. Levy
Some Thoughts On Basic Concepts and Future Directions In The Study of Inter-Group Conflict
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1993; 13(1): 1 - 27.
[PDF]